Key Findings
Substantial Wealth Loss
White southern households with slave assets lost 10-15% more wealth by 1870 compared to similarly wealthy households without slaves
Rapid Recovery
Sons of slaveholders completely recovered by 1880, with wealth levels equal to or greater than sons from comparable households
Social Network Resilience
Recovery was facilitated through white collar employment opportunities and advantageous marriages, suggesting importance of social networks
Wealth Distribution Changes 1860-1870
- Southern wealth declined substantially across distribution from 1860 to 1870
- Largest declines occurred at top of distribution (90th percentile)
- Wealth compression reduced 90-50 ratio from 14:1 to 10:1
Sons' Recovery by Father's Wealth Level
- Sons from 80-94th percentile families fully recovered by 1880
- Sons from top 5% of families surpassed comparison group by 19%
- Recovery persisted through 1900, showing long-term resilience
Occupational Shifts of Slaveholder Sons
- Medium-sized slaveholder sons (3-16 slaves) shifted to white collar work
- Largest slaveholder sons (17+ slaves) maintained agricultural focus
- Occupational adaptation shows different recovery strategies by wealth level
Contribution and Implications
- Demonstrates remarkable persistence of southern elite despite unprecedented wealth shock
- Highlights importance of social networks over pure financial capital in maintaining status
- Suggests limitations of wealth redistribution alone in creating lasting social change
Data Sources
- Wealth distribution chart based on Table 1 showing wealth levels by percentile in 1860 and 1870
- Recovery trajectory visualization derived from Table 2 coefficients for wealth effects across generations
- Occupational shifts chart constructed from Tables 4 and 10 showing son outcomes in 1880