Key Findings
Financial Returns
Unconditional grants of Rs.50,000 to private schools generated strong returns between 37-58%, substantially higher than market lending rates of 15-20%.
Differential Strategy
High-saturation villages (all schools received grants) focused on quality improvements with increased test scores and fees, while low-saturation villages (single school grants) focused on expanding capacity.
Teacher Investment
High-saturation schools increased teacher salaries by 18-22% and hired more new teachers, while low-saturation schools primarily invested in infrastructure.
Revenue and Enrollment Impacts
- High-saturation schools gained Rs.65,813 in annual posted revenues
- Low-saturation treated schools gained Rs.127,987 in annual posted revenues
- Enrollment increased by 9 children in high-saturation and 22 in low-saturation schools
Test Scores and Fee Changes
- High-saturation schools increased test scores by 0.153 standard deviations
- Monthly fees increased by Rs.18.8 (8%) in high-saturation schools
- No significant changes in test scores or fees for low-saturation schools
Teacher Compensation
- High-saturation schools increased annual wage bill by Rs.32,983
- Monthly salary increased by Rs.580 for new teachers
- Monthly salary increased by Rs.492 for existing teachers
Contribution and Implications
- Demonstrates that competitive market forces can provide endogenous incentives for quality improvements in private schools
- Suggests policy value in high-saturation financing approaches that enhance market competition
- Provides evidence that unconditional grants can improve educational outcomes without intensive monitoring
Data Sources
- Revenue and enrollment data from Table 4 and Table 5
- Test score impacts from Table 6
- Teacher compensation data from Table 8